Posted by ronell-smith
Some of the best talks at MozCon each year come from the community speakersāthose who’re able to make a pitch to grace the stage.
This group enjoys the same privileges as the other speakers, including being able to deliver a keynote-style talk, and are always well-received by the audience.
If you’re eager to be a member of this group, step right up.
We’re now open for MozCon community speaker’s pitches.
We’d be happy to have your best effort.
(This year, we’ll have six speakers.)
The nuts & bolts:
- Submitting is as simple as filling out the form below
- Only submit one talk (the one you’re most passionate about)
- Pitches must be related to online marketing & 15 minutes long
- Submissions close Sunday, April 16th at 5pm PDT
- All decisions are final
- Talks must must adhere to the MozCon Code of Conduct
- You’ll be required to be present at MozCon in Seattle
if you submit a pitch, you’ll hear back from us regardless of whether you’re accepted or denied.
Community speakers receive…
- At least 15 minutes on the MozCon stage for a keynote-style presentation, plus 5 minutes of Q&A
- A free ticket to MozCon. (If you already have one, we’ll either refund or transfer the ticket to someone else.)
- Four nights of lodging covered by us at our partner hotel
- A reimbursement for your travel (flight, train, car, etc.), up to 0 domestic and 0 international
- A free ticket for you to give to anyone, plus a code for 0 off another ticket
- An invitation for you and your significant other to join us for the speakers’ dinner.
If you’re curious about what the process look like, take a look at what Zeph Snapp wrote about his experience as a community speaker.
How do you pick speakers?
The selection committee, comprised of Mozzers, reviews every pitch. Initially, we review only the topics. This helps us make sure the topics match our audience.
Later we look at the entirety of the pitch, with an eye for what the finished product would look like on stage.
Things to consider for your pitch:
- Focus your pitch on online marketing. MozCon is all about actionable information.
- Your pitch is for MozCon organizations, so detail what you’re talking about. We need to know the actual tactics you’ll be sharing.
- Read this post on how to prepare for speaking, from pitching to the actual gig.
- Review the topics already accepted to ensure there is no overlap.
- Honor the form’s word limits. (Linking to Google Docs, for example, will result in an immediate disqualification.)
- No one from the speaker selection committee will be able to evaluate your pitch in advance.
- Lobbying on social media is frowned upon and won’t do you any good.
- Link to a video of you presenting and to your SlideShare channel (or wherever we can take a look at decks you’ve created in the past)
A little weak in the knees about speaking at MozCon?
Don’t be scurred.
We’ve got your back.
Whether a speaker has hundreds of talks under her belt or is giving her first talk, we work with them to deliver a product she’lll be proud of and the audience will both love and learn from.
We provide instruction on topics and review the content in its entirety.
We encourage pitches from speakers of all backgrounds, knowledge levels, and speaking experiences.
A few additional things we help with:
- Discuss and refine your topic
- Assist in honing topic title and description
- Review outlines and drafts
- Best practices and guidance for slide decks, specifically for our stage
- A comprehensive, step-by-step guide for show flow
- Serve as an audience for practicing your talk
- Review your final deck
- Sunday night pre-MozCon tour of the stage to meet our A/V crew, see your presentation on the screens, and test the clicker
- A 15-person dedicated crew to make your A/V outstanding
- Whatever else we can do to make your talk outstanding
Now over to you.
If you’ve ever had a vision of making onto the MozCon stage, this is your best shot.
So, umm, shouldn’t you be typing feverishly in the Google Form above?
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Posted by SimonPenson
Incredible, isnāt it? Despite all the fanfare and pageantry that has followed content marketing over the last few years, fewer than 6% of marketers confidently claim to be executing content marketing strategies properly.
Itās just one of a handful of eye-popping stats to come out of the State of Content Marketing Survey, a major new survey of senior UK marketers this month as part of a campaign to help create healthy debate around the misunderstood tactic.
With more budget than ever before pouring into the approach (60% of those surveyed said they were opening the purse strings further in 2017) 92% admitted to not knowing exactly how they should execute.
To check out all the results from the survey, click below (opens up in a new tab):
The biggest pain point of all to come out of the State of Content Marketing survey?
“Producing engaging content, consistently.”
I had been reading all the results with mild interest until those words stopped me dead in my tracks.
You may think the source of that concern stemmed from the fact that such a thing should be easy to manage, but it goes deeper than that.
Success with content is predicated entirely on your ability to consistently produce content that engages, resonates and adds value to your audienceās lives. And if producing that is the single biggest barrier then we have a problem!
You see, investment in content is a waste of money if you donāt have a well-designed plan to deliver constant content.
It doesnāt matter how brilliant your campaigns are if your audience has no other content to come back to and engage with.
And this is where the constant content plan comes in…
The concept is a simple one: no content plan is complete unless it’s based around delivering content consistently.
To do this requires a focus on strategy, not just on a few blog posts and the odd bigger campaign.
The best way to explain this is to visualize it in a different way. Below, youāll see a simple diagram to throw light on my point.
Here we can see how a campaign-led strategy exposes holes in your plan. While we have plenty of activity going on in both our owned and earned channels, the issue is what goes on between large content launches. Where do those people go during those periods of inactivity? How do we keep them engaged when there’s no central content hub to pull them into?
This kind of approach is something we see often, especially from larger brands where budgets allow for more creative content campaigns to be run regularly, and hereās why it doesnāt yield positive ROI.
As human beings, we like variety. To keep us hooked, content delivery needs to reflect this. Campaigns need to be designed as part of a whole, becoming a peak content moment rather than the only content moment, pulling new audiences back to the constant content activity going on at the center of brand activity.
You see it in the way magazines are organized, starting with an initial section of often short-form content before you then hit a four-plus-page feature. This is done to ensure we keep turning the pages, experiencing variation as we do so.
This is something I like to call content flow. Itās a great strategic “tool” to help ensure you design your overall strategy the right way.
The approach to strategy
The key is actually very simple. It focuses the mind on the creation of a content framework that enables you to produce lots of high-quality regular content and the ideas that flow from it. I call it the “Constant Content Plan.”
The right way to approach the content planning phase is to create a process that supports the building of layers of different content types, like we see below in our second diagram:
In this example, you can see how we intersperse the bigger campaigns with lots of owned content, creating a blog and resources section that gives the new visitor something to explore and come back to. Without it, they simply float back out into the content abyss and onto someone elseās radar.
That consistent delivery ā and the audience retention it creates ā comes from the smaller content pieces, the glue that binds it together; the strategy in its entirety.
“Smaller” doesnāt mean lower-quality, however, and investing lots of time through the ideation phase for these pieces is critical to success.
Creating smaller ideas
To do this well and create that constant content strategy, a great place to start is by looking at the ideas magazines use. For example, these are the regular content types you often find in the best-crafted titles:
- What I’ve learned
Advice piece from a heavy-hitter. Can sometimes be expanded to what I’ve learned in my 20s, 30s, 40s, etc.
- The dual interview
Get two people
together for an interview. Write an intro as to why theyāre there, and then
transcribe their chat. Bingo: unique content.
- Have you ever/What do you think of?
Pose a question
and ask ten people for their responses. Good reactive content to a particular
event that might pertain to one of our clients.
- Cash for questions
Get an interviewee/expert and pose them a series of questions gathered from real-life members of the public.
- A day in the life
What it says on the tin ā an in-depth look at someone of interest’s working day.
- Person vs person debate
with a question or subject matter, get two people, put it to them, and record
- Master xxxxxx in five minutes
A short how-to ā can be delivered in pictorial or video format.
This style of regular series content lends itself well to online
strategy, too. By running these regularly, you create both variety and
the critical stickiness required to keep the audience coming back.
course, with such variation it also then allows you to create better
newsletters, social strategies, and even inbound marketing plans,
maximizing that return on investment.
The strategy allows
for informative content as well as entertaining pieces. In doing so, it gives your brand the opportunity to build subject trust and authority, as well as capturing key opportunities in the purchase funnel such as
micro-moments and pain points.
combination of informative and entertaining output ensures you’re
front and center when your customer eventually falls into the
One way of bringing this to life is to look at brands already executing well.
One of the best blog strategies I have seen in some time is the one by Scotts Menswear. One of the key reasons for its quality is the fact it’s run by a very experienced print editor.
we reverse-engineer what theyāve been doing on-page, we can clearly see
that much thought has gone into creating variation, entertainment, and usefulness in a single well-rounded strategy.
Take the last ten posts, for instance. Here’s what we have and how it flows:
- Seven Films We’re Looking Forward to in 2017 ā Video-based entertainment/lifestyle piece.
- Key Pieces for Your January Fitness Drive ā Trending content with useful advice.
- Style Focus ā A great regular piece that jumps on trending “news” to discuss the implications for fashion.
- Updated Classics from Puma ā A news article on a new trainer release.
- Polo Shirts: A Wardrobe Staple ā An in-depth guide to a key piece of clothing (part of a series).
- Our Guide to Valentine’s Day ā Lifestyle guide that helps convey brand positioning, tonality, and opinion.
- Nail Your Valentine’s Day Outfit ā
Helpful guide to getting it right on a key seasonal event in the
audienceās calendar. Clearly, they see Valentine’s as a sales peak.
- Get Your Overhead Jacket Kicks ā Guide to a fashion staple.
- 5 Brands and Acts Tipped for Greatness ā Lifestyle piece tapping into the music/fashion brand positioning.
- Our 5 Favorite Trainers Online Right Now ā Great list feature to help the consumer buy smarter.
can clearly see how they’re using structured thinking to create a blog
of real variety and value. By combining this with a strong big-bang
content plan that sucks in new visitors, you can build a hefty
retained audience that improves critical metrics such as dwell time,
returning visits, engagement, and sales.
Building our own plan
I know what you’re thinking. “Sounds great, for a brand in fashion.
Itās cool and interesting. But I work in a ‘boring’ niche and this type of
stuff just isnāt possible.”
While it could be a little more difficult that doesnāt mean it is impossible by any stretch of the imagination.
To prove the point, letās look at a fictional example for a company in the medical products sector.
the deal: A2Z Medical is a company built up in the ’60s and ’70s. They
have a huge B2B footprint but want to bring their marketing strategy
into the current decade, in part because they are launching a consumer-facing brand for the first time. The new venture will offer medical kits for the general public and as such requires a proactive, content-led
strategy to promote trust, awareness, and engagement alongside the
obvious requirement for sales.
The first step in building a content strategy is to understand your audience.
could go into the detail of that all day long, but for the sake of this
example we already have detailed data that tells us there are two main
groups of people interested in coming to and buying from the site.
is an obsessive ailment Googler, worrying over every little thing that
he or his family suffers. Heās a detail man and wants to be prepared
for all eventualities.
Chloe, on the other hand, has very
different needs. She’s a mum, works part-time to help pay the bills, and
then devotes herself to her family and children.
She’s time-poor and takes a practical view on life to make it work. Her purchase behavior is based on distress or urgent need.
Different need states
is abundantly clear from this very quick overview that each have very
different purchase journeys and needs from a content perspective.
We’ll look at what this means for our content strategy a little later. Before we dive into that, though, we must also look at our understanding of
the market opportunity.
This data-dive helps us to
understand what people are looking for now in the space, where they get
it from currently, and where the gaps may be.
This work is carried out by one of our content strategists before any
creative sessions take place. This ensures we can validate ideas back to
what the data tells us.
So, what does that process involve? Letās look at each stage briefly now:
- Long-tail research
- Quora/Reddit/forum research
- Magazine research
- Pub beers!
It’s a well-covered subject area, but also a very important one; it often yields ideas that convert fastest to traffic and revenue.
1. Long-tail research
Much has been written (including this piece I penned in 2015)
on this subject area, and in much more detail than I aim to cover it here. Right now, letās focus on some key tools and areas for opportunity.
It’s easy to get lost in this process, so the key is to keep it simple. To do this, I stick to a small handful of tools:
- SerpStat ā Has a useful long-tail tool based on Google Suggest to give you lists of questions by keyword phrase.
- Keywordtool.io ā A similar tool, but free to use. Slightly more clunky.
ā A new tool by the makers of Buzzsumo. Does a great job of finding
opportunities from other sources, such as other sites and forums. It
also has a nice data visualization view that gives you volume and key
competitor info, the latter of which can be helpful for a later stage in
the process. Hereās an example of a search for “first aid”:
ā A free tool that pulls long-tail phrases from a variety of sources
for content ideas and also includes some demographic data. This
can be helpful when it comes to matching ideas to personas.
the sake of this process, we’re not looking to build a full long-tail
strategy, of course. This is solely about finding content ideas with
search volume attached to them.
By downloading from a bunch of
sources (such as those above), it’s then relatively easy to de-dupe them
in Excel and create a master list of ideas to pull into your overall
It can make sense to segment or classify those ideas by
persona, too. I do this via simple color coding, as you can see below.
This allows you to create a shortlist of ideas that are on-brand and
have the required level of opportunity attached.
Working this way makes sure you’re thinking hard about serving the needs and pain points of the personas.
further reinforce this point, it can work very well to include a mini-brainstorm as part of this stage, gathering a few people to talk
specifically about the pain points experienced by each persona.
In this session, it’s also useful to talk through the various micro-moment opportunities by asking what questions they ask in each of the following scenarios:
I want to goā¦.
I want to doā¦
I want to knowā¦
I want to buyā¦
You should end up with a list of content ideas per persona that covers pain points and interests.
2. Quora/Reddit/forum research
Another great source of information is the world of forums and aggregator sites. As you might expect, this starts with sub-Reddit research.
Within categories like those below lies a wealth of questions, the answers to which form brilliant article inspiration:
we pop into the /AskDocs/ forum, we see a plethora of medical challenges
from people looking for help ā perfect real-world examples of everyday
ailments that a site like ours could help to answer.
Q: I have a painful stomach when eating porkā¦?
Q: Will I need less sleep if Iām on a good diet and active?
Q: Swollen lymph nodes and nose bleeds. What could be going on?
The answers to these questions often require much research and
professional advice, but by working through them for the less-serious everyday issues you could soon help Chloe out and become a useful ally.
The same is also true of Quora. You can play around with
advanced search queries to drill into the juiciest boards by carrying
out searches such as:
Another fantastic area worthy of
research focus is forums. We use these to ask our peers and topic
experts questions, so spending some time understanding what’s being
asked within your market can be very helpful.
One of the best ways of doing this is to perform a simple advanced Google search as outlined below:
“keyword” + “forum”
For our example, we might type:
search engine then delivers a list of super-relevant sites designed to
answer medical questions and we can easily pick through them to extract
ideas for popular content.
And as an extra tip search for your
keyword and āvBulletinā ā a popular software used for forum sites. This
will often surface rarely found sites with some real insight into
particularly the older demographic, who are more likely to use
3. Magazine research
very important area to explore is magazine research. They contain some of the most refined content
strategies in existence; the level of expertise that goes into idea
creation and headline writing is without equal.
sense, therefore, to find titles relevant to your niche (in our case,
health and medicine) and look for great content opportunities.
can even do this online, to a degree. If you go to a site like
magazines.com, greatmagazines.co.uk, other magazine subscription sites, or even perform a Google image search, youāll find a myriad of
headline ideas simply by looking at covers.
In the example
below I’ve Googled “medical magazines” and found numerous cover lines
that would form great digital content. Hereās an example from just one,
4. Pub beers
And last but certainly not least, we have the tried and true “chat-in-a-pub” approach. It might sound like an excuse for a beer, but itās actually very useful.
you can find a handful of people aligned to your personas, offer to buy
them a few drinks and chat through their experiences and challenges.
Youāll be surprised what you find out!
course, it pays to add some level of alignment to the plan by
understanding which products offer the best margin or are most
important to the business.
This info should come out of your
initial onboarding and overall strategy creation process, but it can
also be found via Analytics (if set up correctly) by looking for the
best-selling products and finding out their trade cost.
The creative process
this point, youāll be overflowing with data and ideas for content. The
challenge, however, is ensuring that you can add variation to that ideas mix. I call this stage the “Magazine and Hero Process.”
create that level of engagement and stickiness, we need ideas that are
less practical and more entertaining. Any good content strategy should
include a good mix of both informational and entertaining ideas; the
first part of our creative brainstorm focuses on concepts that will
achieve this balance.
We follow a structure that looks loosely like the below:
We start by asking “human” questions about each of our personas. While we may have completed all the keyword research in the world, it’s important to take a real-world view on pain points and so forth.
From here we discuss the purchase funnel stage, ensuring that we have ideas not just for the top of the funnel but all the way through it, backed by a mix of content types to support that variation aim.
That conversation will then be followed by a look at the brand’s wider marketing plan and seasonal events to ensure we plan key periods of activity thoroughly.
And the icing on the top is the quick look at our “swipe file,” a treasure trove of old ideas we’ve seen, to see if we can borrow a concept or two for our plan.
The second and final stage of our ideation is a forensic exploration into what magazines can offer. I am a voracious devourer of specialist magazines; it can really pay dividends to look for clever ideas or content series to bring into your plan before the massive validation process begins. This will sort the possible from the impossible.
By following a set way of discussing ideas, you’ll leave no stone unturned.
discussion around the purchase funnel often turns out to be incredibly
important: it ensures you look not just for ideas that help
with awareness, but also further down the funnel. It’s also possible to
tie content types in to this to ensure variation between the types of
content you produce.
To do this we use the Content Matrix I created specifically for this purpose; you can see it below:
idea here is that it makes it easier to decide what content types fit
with which parts of the funnel best and also the relative size of that
content in terms of the man hours required to create it.
Working in this logical fashion will help with overall content mix.
you’ve worked through that process, it’s time to open up bigger ideas. These are important for one very simple reason: they help you find
and reach new audiences to pull back into your sensational constant content plan.
We wonāt go into detail here as to how to come
up with consistently good big-bang ideas, as the point of this post is to
look at the more regular content strategy, but if you want to read more
now, it’s enough to note that you should also include time to think
about campaigns and how they fit into your overall plan.
Pulling it together ā process + example
now, you should be swimming in great ideas of every kind
imaginable, every one of which ties back nicely to your personas.
our example, we’ve been focusing on Chloe and James. The next job
is to lay those ideas out based on what you know can be delivered.
This process is broken into two parts:
- The laying out of the content based on ensuring variation and content flow.
- Fitting that plan into an operational format that’s deliverable and based on available resources and/or budgets.
that to work is little more than trial and error, but the result should
be a content calendar that delivers on the promise of a great mix of
regular content ideas, entertaining pieces, and helpful content that
makes both James and Chloe want to come back to again and again.
Hereās an example of a two-week window to give you an idea of how just a portion of that regular content might play out:
Fancy giving it a go? You can use this free brand-as-publisher download
to make the process easier. It contains all the tools and templates you
need to ensure your output joins up the dots to maximize engagement and
āstickinessā from your regular content and to critically fix your
issues with content marketing effectiveness.
And for those of you that want to see the Content Marketing Survey results in full click on the banner above to claim your free results ebook, complete with commentary, or scroll below for the highlights…
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Posted by MarieHaynes
It has now been six months since the launch of Penguin 4.0. In my opinion, Penguin 4.0 was awesome. It took ages for Google to release this update, but when they did, it was much more fair than previous versions of Penguin. Previous versions of Penguin would cause entire sites to be suppressed if the algorithm thought that you’d engaged in manipulative link building. Even if a site did a thorough link cleanup, the suppression would remain present until Google re-ran the Penguin algorithm and recognized your cleanup efforts. It was not uncommon to see situations like this:
I saw many businesses that had looooooong periods of time of suppression ā even years!
According to Google spokesperson Gary Illyes, the new version of Penguin that was released in September of 2016 no longer suppresses sites:
Now, instead of causing a sitewide demotion when Penguin detects spam, theyāll simply devalue that spam so that it canāt help improve a siteās rankings.
Iām guessing that it took a lot of brainpower to figure out how to do this. Google now has enough trust in their ability to find and devalue spam that they are comfortable removing the punitive aspect of Penguin. Thatās impressive.
This change brings up a question that I am asked several times a week now:
If Penguin is able to devalue spam, is there any reason to disavow links any more?
I’ve been asked this enough times now that I figured it was a good idea to write an article on my answer to this question.
A brief refresher: What is the disavow tool?
The disavow tool was given to us in October of 2012.
You can use it by uploading a file to Google that contains a list of either URLs or domains. Then, as Google crawls the web, if they come across a URL or domain that is in your disavow file, they wonāt use links from that page in their calculations of PageRank for your site. Those links also wonāt be used by the Penguin algorithm when it decides whether your site has been involved in webspam.
For sites that were affected by Penguin in the past, the disavow tool was an integral part of getting the suppression lifted off the site. It was essentially a way of saying to Google, āHey… in the past we made some bad links to our site. But we donāt want you to use those links in your calculations.ā Ideally, it would be best to remove bad links from the web, but thatās not always possible. The disavow tool was, in my opinion, super important for any site that was hit by Penguin.
For more in-depth information on using the disavow tool, see this Moz post: https://moz.com/blog/guide-to-googles-disavow-tool
What does Google say about using the disavow tool now?
It wasnāt long after the release of Penguin 4.0 before people starting asking Google whether the disavow tool was still necessary. After all, if Google can just devalue spam links on their own, why should I have to disavow them?
Here are some replies from Google employees:
Now, the conspiracy theorists out there will say, āOf course Google wants you to disavow! They need that data to machine-learn for Penguin!ā
Google has said that Penguin is not a machine learning algorithm:
And even if they ARE using disavow data for some kind of machine learning training set, really, does it matter? In my opinion, if Google is saying that we should be still using the disavow tool, I donāt think they’re trying to trick us. I think it still has a real purpose.
Three reasons why I still recommend using the disavow tool
There are three main reasons why I still recommend disavowing. However, I donāt recommend it in as many cases as I used to.
1) Manual actions still exist
You do NOT want to risk getting a manual unnatural links penalty. I have documented on Moz before about the many cases I’ve seen where a manual unnatural links penalty was devastating to the long-term health of a site.
Google employee Gary Illyes commented during a podcast that, when a Google webspam team member looks at your siteās links, they can often see labels next to the links. He said the following:
āIf the manual actions team is reviewing a site for whatever reason, and they see that most of the links are labeled as Penguin Real-Time affected, then they might decide to take a much deeper look on the site… and then maybe apply a manual action on the site because of the links. ā
In other words, if you have an unnatural link profile and you leave it up to Penguin to devalue your links rather than disavowing, then youāre at risk for getting a manual action.
Of course, if you actually do have a manual action, then youāll need to use the disavow tool as part of your cleanup efforts along with manual link removal.
2) There are other algorithms that use links
Link quality has always been important to Google. I believe that Penguin is just one way in which Google fights against unnatural links algorithmically. One example of another algorithm that likely uses links is the Payday Loans algorithm. This algorithm isnāt just for payday loans sites; it also affects sites in many high-competition verticals.
Bill Slawski recently posted this interesting article on his thoughts about a recent patent filed by Google. In one place, the patent talks about a situation where a resource may have a large number of links pointing to it but there is a disproportionate amount of traffic. In cases like that, the page being linked to might actually be demoted in rankings.
Now, thatās just a patent, so it doesnāt mean for sure that there’s actually an algorithm behind this… but there could be! Makes you think, right?
Google is always trying to fight against link spam and Penguin is just one of the ways in which they do this. If there are links that are potentially causing my link profile to look spammy to Google, then I donāt want them to count in any calculations that Google is making.
3) Can we trust that Penguin is able to devalue all spam pointing to our site?
The official announcement from Google on Penguin is here. Here’s what it says about devaluing as opposed to demoting:
“Penguin is now more granular. Penguin now devalues spam by adjusting ranking based on spam signals, rather than affecting ranking of the whole site.”
This statement is not clear to me. I have questions:
- When Google says they are āadjusting ranking,ā could that also be negative adjustments?
- Can Penguin possibly demote rankings for certain pages rather than affecting the whole site?
- Can Penguin possibly demote rankings for certain keywords rather than affecting the whole site?
As posted above, we received some clarification on this from Google employees in a Facebook post (and again via tweets) to tell us that Penguin 4.0 doesnāt penalize, but rather devalues spam. However, these are not official statements from Google. These statements may mean that we never have to worry about any link pointing to our site ever again. Perhaps? Or they could mean that there’s less need to worry than there was previously.
Personally, if my business relies on Google organic rankings in order to succeed, I’m a little leery about putting all of my trust in this algorithmās ability to ignore unnatural links and not let them hurt me.
Who should be disavowing?
While I do still recommend use of the disavow tool, I only recommend it in the following situations:
- For sites that have made links for SEO purposes on a large scale ā If you or an SEO company on your behalf made links in low-quality directories, low-quality article sites, bookmark sites, or as comment spam, then these need to be cleaned up. Here’s more information on what makes a link a low-quality link. You can also run links past my disavow blacklist if you’re not sure whether itās a good one or not. Low-quality links like this are probably being devalued by Penguin, but they’re the type of link that could lead to a manual unnatural links penalty if you happen to get a manual review by the webspam team and they havenāt been disavowed.
- For sites that previously had a manual action for unnatural links ā I’ve found that if a site has enough of a spam problem to get an unnatural links penalty, then that site usually ends up collecting more spam links over the years. Sometimes this is because low-quality directories pop up and scrape info from other low-quality directories. Sometimes it’s because old automated link-generating processes keep on running. And sometimes I donāt have an explanation, but spammy links just keep appearing. In most cases, sites that have a history of collecting unnatural links tend to continue to collect them. If this is the case for you, then itās best to disavow those on a regular basis (either monthly or quarterly) so that you can avoid getting another manual action.
- For sites under obvious negative SEO attacks ā The key here is the word “obvious.” I do believe that in most cases, Google is able to figure out that spam links pointed at a site are links to be ignored. However, at SMX West this year, Gary Illyes said that the algorithm can potentially make mistakes:
If you have a bunch of pharma and porn links pointing at your site, itās not a bad idea to disavow them, but actually in most cases I just ignore these. Where I do recommend disavowing for negative SEO attacks is when the links pointing at your site contain anchors for keywords for which you want to rank. If itās possible that a webspam team member could look at your link profile and think that there are a lot of links there that exist just for SEO reasons, then you want to be sure that those are cleaned up.
Who does NOT need to disavow?
If you look at your links and notice some “weird” links that you canāt explain, donāt panic!
Every site gets strange links, and often quite a few of them. If you havenāt been involved in manipulative SEO, you probably do not need to be disavowing links.
When Google takes action either manually or algorithmically against a site for unnatural linking, it’s because the site has been actively trying to manipulate Google rankings on a large scale. If you made a couple of directory links in the past, youāre not going to get a penalty.
You also donāt need to disavow just because you notice sitewide links pointing to you. It can look scary to see in Google Search Console that one site is linking to you thousands of times, especially if that link is keyword-anchored. However, Google knows that this is a sitewide link and not thousands of individual links. If you made the link yourself in order to help your rankings, then sure, go ahead and disavow it. But if it just appeared, itās probably nothing to worry about.
There are some cases where it can be difficult to decide whether or not to disavow. I sometimes have trouble advising on cases where a company has hired a medium- to high-quality SEO firm that’s done a lot of link building ā rather than link earning ā for them.
Here’s an example of a case that would be difficult:
Letās say you’ve been getting most of your links by guest posting. These guest posts are not on low-quality sites that exist just to post articles, but rather on sites that real humans read. Are those good links?
According to Google, if you’re guest posting primarily for the sake of getting links, then these are unnatural links. Here’s a quote from Google employee John Mueller:
“Think about whether or not this is a link that would be on your site if it werenāt for your actionsā¦When it comes to guest blogging itās a situation where you are placing links on other peopleās sites together with this content, so thatās something I kind of shy away from purely from a link building point of view. It can make sense to guest blog on other peopleās sites to drive some traffic to your siteā¦ but you should use a nofollow.”
If you have a small number of guest posts, Google is unlikely to go after you. But what if a webspam team member looks at your links and sees that you have a very large number of links built via guest posting efforts? That makes me uncomfortable.
You could consider disavowing those links to avoid getting a manual action. Itās quite possible, though, that those links are actually helping your site. Disavowing them could cause you to drop in rankings.
This article could easily turn into a discussion on the benefits and risks of guest posting if we had the space and time. My point in mentioning this is to say that some disavow decisions are tough.
In general, my rule of thumb is that you should use the disavow file if you have a good number of links that look like you made them with SEO as your primary goal.
Should you be auditing your disavow file?
I do believe that some sites could benefit from pruning their disavow file. However, I have yet to see any reports from anyone who has claimed to have done this and seen benefit that we can reasonably attribute to the recovery of PageRank that flows through those links.
If you have used your disavow file in the past in an effort to remove a manual action or recover from a Penguin hit, then there’s a good possibility that you were overly aggressive in your disavow efforts. I know I’ve had some manual penalties that were really difficult to remove and we likely disavowed more links than were necessary. In cases like those, we could go through our disavow files and remove the domains that were questionable disavow decisions.
Itās not always easy to do this, though, especially if you’ve done the correct thing and have disavowed on the domain level. If this is the case, you wonāt have actual URLs in your disavow file to review. Itās hard to make reavowing decisions without seeing the actual link in question.
Here’s a process you can use to audit your disavow file. It gets a little technical, but if you want to give it a try, here it is:
(Note: Many of these steps are explained in greater detail and with pictures here.)
- Download your disavow file from Google: https://www.google.com/webmasters/tools/disavow-links-main
- Get a list of your links from Google Search Console. (Itās not a bad idea to also get links from other sources, as well.)
- On your CSV of links, make a column for domains. You can extract the domain by using this formula, assuming your URLs are in Column B:
You can then use Find and Replace to replace the http, https, and www. with blanks. Now you have a list of domains.
- On your disavow file, get a list of domains you’ve disavowed by replacing domain: with blanks. (This is assuming you have disavowed on the domain level and not the URL level.)
- Put your new list of disavowed domains on the second sheet of your links spreadsheet and fill Column B down with “disavowed”.
- Now, on the links list, weāre going to use a VLOOKUP to figure out which of our current live links are ones that we’ve previously disavowed. In this formula, your domains are in the first column of each spreadsheet and I’ve used 1000 as the total number of domains in my disavow list. Here goes:
- Now you can take the domains that are in your disavow file and audit those URLs.
What weāre looking for here are URLs where we had disavowed them just to be safe, but in reality, they are probably OK links.
Note: Just as in regular link auditing work, do not make decisions based on blanket metrics. While some of these metrics can help us make decisions, you do not want to base your decision for reavowing solely on Domain Authority, spam score, or some other metric. Rather, you want to look at each domain and think, āIf a webspam team member looked at this link, would they think it only exists for SEO reasons, or does it have a valid purpose outside of SEO?ā
Letās say we’ve gone through the links in our disavow file and have found 20 links that we’d like to reavow. We would then go back to the disavow file that we downloaded from Google and remove the lines that say “domain:example.com” for each of those domains which we want to reavow.
Upload your disavow file to Google again. This will overwrite your old file. At some point in the future Google should start counting the links that you’ve removed from the file again. However, there are a few things to note:
- Matt Cutts from Google mentioned in a video that reavowing a link takes “a lot longer” than disavowing. They built a lag function into the tool to try to stop spammers from reverse-engineering the algorithm.
- Matt Cutts also said in the same video that a reavowed link may not carry the same weight it once did.
If this whole process of reavowing sounds too complicated, you can hire me to do the work for you. I might be willing to do the work at a discount if you allow me to use your site (anonymously) as a case study to show whether reavowing had any discernible benefit.
Should we still be using the disavow tool? In some cases, the answer to this is yes. If you have links that are obviously there for mostly SEO reasons, then it’s best to disavow these so that they donāt cause you to get a manual action in the future. Also, we want to be sure that Google isn’t using these links in any sort of algorithmic calculations that take link quality into account. Remember, itās not just Penguin that uses links.
I think that it is unlikely that filing a disavow will cause a site to see a big improvement in rankings, unless the site is using it to recover from a sitewide manual action. Others will disagree with me, however. In fact, a recent Moz blog post showed a possible recovery from an algorithmic suppression shortly after a site filed a disavow. I think that, in this case, the recovery may have been due to a big algorithm change that SEOs call Fred that happened at the same time, rather than the filing of a disavow file.
In reality, though, no one outside of Google knows for sure how effective the disavow tool is now. We know that Google says we should still use it if we find unnatural links pointing to our site. As such, my advice is that if you have unnatural links, you should still be disavowing.
Iād love to hear what you think. Please do leave a comment below!
Sign up for The Moz Top 10, a semimonthly mailer updating you on the top ten hottest pieces of SEO news, tips, and rad links uncovered by the Moz team. Think of it as your exclusive digest of stuff you don’t have time to hunt down but want to read!
Posted by Nick_Sayers
After five years at Moz, Iāve found that I work with some of the most creative and talented people Iāve ever met. When it came time to brainstorm ideas for an April Fools video this year, rather than tricking people like every other company does, we decided instead to showcase a few of the talented folks around the Mozplex. Alongside Kristina Keyser, we shot and edited this video so you can see what makes us Mozzers tick when we arenāt building sweet SEO software.
We know a lot of you, in the community, have random hobbies like us ā weād love to hear about them! Please share them with us in the comments.
Looking for more information on all the cool stuff you just saw? We have that for you, too!
Check out my movie, The Last Buck Hunt, on Amazon Prime.
If you want to sing Teenage Dirtbag like Chiaryn, start with this karaoke wiki.
David would like for you to check out his Seattle-based band, Your Favorite Friend.
The Modern Quilt Guild is a great place to meet other quilters and find meet-ups to show off your work.
If you’re looking for a great community around knitting, Alex recommends Ravelry.
Abe would like for you to know more about making old-school gaming beats by checking out Chip Musicās forum.
It’s really cool to see that Katie does martial arts at Seven Star Women’s Kung Fu, because it’s rare to see schools like this just for ladies.
Looking for beautiful pictures from around the world? Peep Kristina’s photography.
Looking to get super duper ripped like Lucas? Learn more about Bodypump.
Looking to adopt a dog in the Seattle area? Janisha recommends starting your adoption search now.
Posted by randfish
Even if you know ā deep down in your heart of hearts ā how important SEO is, it’s hard to prioritize when you have less than 3 hours a month to devote to it. But there’s still a way to include the bare minimum, even if you run on a tight schedule. In today’s Whiteboard Friday, Rand covers a minimum viable SEO strategy to give those with limited time a plan going forward.
Howdy, Moz fans, and welcome to another edition of Whiteboard Friday. This week, Minimum Viable SEO. So if you only have a few minutes in a month, in a week to do some SEO, and I know many of you are professional SEOs, but you work with lots of folks, like content creators, clients, web developers, who have very, very limited time, what I want to try and do is provide a path for you of “do this if you have no other time in the week to do your SEO.”
So let’s say here’s my calendar. It’s February, so 28 days. Start of the month, you have an hour to give me, sometime in the first week of the month. It doesn’t have to be, but that’s a great way to go. At the start of each week, I’m going to ask for 10 minutes just to do a little bit of planning, and then each time you publish content, a very, very small amount of time, just 3 minutes.
I know it sounds hard to believe, but you can get a fair amount of solid SEO work. Especially if you’re in an industry that is not hyper-competitive or if you’re going after the right kinds of keywords, that aren’t super competitive, you can really make a difference. If you’re building up a lot of content over months and years, just following this simple protocol can really take your SEO to the next level.
Start of the month: 1 hour
So, all right, let’s say we’re at the start of our month. We have our hour. I want you to do one of two things, and this is going to be based on if you’re technical SEO, meaning if your website is using WordPress and it’s pretty much nicely crawlable, maybe you’ve signed up for Google Search Console, you don’t see a lot of errors, there’s not a lot of issues, you haven’t created a bunch of technical data on your website in the past, great, fine, then you’re going to be focused on keywords and content. A keyword to content map, which is something we’ve discussed here on Whiteboard Friday ā I’d urge you to check that video out if you haven’t yet ā but I’m going to make an MVP version, a very, very small version that can help a little bit.
Keyword ā content map MVP
Create a spreadsheet with valuable keywords…
That spreadsheet, I just want a spreadsheet with a few things in it, three things really. The most valuable keywords, so just the most valuable keywords that you know you’re targeting or that you care about right now for your business. You think that people are searching for these keywords. Maybe you’ve done a little bit of keyword research. It could be for free, through Google’s AdWords tool, or you could pay for something like Keyword Explorer for Moz, but, really, just 50 to 100 keywords in there.
…current rank and SERP features…
I want the current rank and whatever SERP features appear. You could even trim this down to just your current ranking and the top search SERP feature, so if it has a featured snippet, or if it has videos, or if it shows maps or news, whatever that is, tweets.
…and the URL targeting it (or a note to create content).
Then I want the URL that’s targeting it. Or if you have no URL targeting it yet, you haven’t yet created a piece of content that targets this keyword, put a little, “Okay, that’s a ‘needs to be created.’ I need this before I can start targeting this keyword and trying to rank for it.”
You’re going to update this weekly. You can do that totally manually. Fifty keywords, you can look them up in an hour. You can check the rankings. You can see where you’re going. That’s fine. It’s a little bit of a pain in the butt, but it can totally be done. Or you could use a tool, Moz Pro, Ahrefs, SEMRush, Searchmetrics. There are all sorts of tools out there that’ll track rankings and show you which features appear and whether your URLs are in there or not.
Okay, this is our keyword to content map. If you have that hour, but you know you have technical issues on the site, I’m going to urge you, before you focus on keywords and content, to make sure your technical SEO, your crawl is set. That means, step one, just a basic, simple crawl analysis. So for free, you can use Google Search Console. It will show you, most of the time with relative accuracy, big important errors like 404s and 500s and things that Google thought we’re duplicate content and that kind of stuff.
If you want to pay, you can get a little bit more advanced features and some better filters and sorting and more frequency and those kinds of things. Moz Pro is fine for that. Screaming Frog is good, OnPage.org. All of these are popular in the SEO field.
Crawl/technical SEO review
Step two, you don’t need to worry about every single crawl issue. I just want you to worry about the most severe, most important ones with your one hour. Those are things like 404s and 500s, which can really cause a lot of problems, duplicate content, where you potentially need to use a rel=canonical or a 301 redirect, broken links, where you just go in and fix the broken link to something that’s not broken, missing or bad titles, title elements that are particularly long or include misspellings or that just don’t exist, bad, very bad to have a page on the web with no title, and thin content or no crawlable content. Those are really the worst of the bunch. There’s a number more that you could take care of. But if you only have that limited time, take care of this. If you’ve already done this, then we can move on here.
Every time you publish a piece of content: 3 minutes
Finally, last thing, but not the least, every time you publish a piece of content, I’m going to ask for just three minutes of your time, and that is going to be around this minimum viable pre-publish checklist.
The minimum viable pre-publish checklist
So does the content have a keyword target? Yes, no, maybe? If it doesn’t, you’re going to need to go and refer over to your keyword content list and make sure that it does. So if you’re publishing something, I’m assuming you’re not publishing a tremendous amount of content, but a little bit. Make sure everyone has a keyword target. Make sure, if you can, that it’s targeting two to three additional keywords, related keywords. So let’s say I’m going after something like Faberge eggs. I probably also want to target Carl Faberge, or I want to target Faberge eggs museums, or I want to target Faberge eggs replicas, so these other terms and phrases that people are likely searching for that could have the same or similar keyword intent, that could live on the same page, that kind of thing.
Is that keyword in the title, the main one you’re targeting? Do you have a compelling meta description? Is your content doing a good job of truly answering the searchers’ queries? So if they’ve searched for this thing, are you serving up the content they need?
Then, have you used related topics? You can get those from places like the MozBar or MarketMuse or SEO Zone or Moz Pro. Related topics are essentially the words and phrases that you should also be using in addition to your keyword to indicate to the search engines, “Hey, this is really about this topic.” We’ve seen some nice bumps from that.
You’re doing this every time you publish content. It only takes three minutes.
Start of the week: 10 minutes
And the last thing, at the start of the week, I’m also asking you for these 10 minutes to do one or two actions. I just want you to plan one or two actions at the start of the week to bump your SEO. It could include some publication stuff. But let’s assume you’re just doing these three minutes every time you do that.
Take a few actions to boost your SEO
Link outreach and targeting keywords with content
At the start of the week, the last thing you’re doing is just choosing one of these, maybe two. I don’t need more. I want you to do something like link outreach. Reach out to a couple of high-potential targets. Maybe you use like a LinkedIn or SecTool to figure out people who are linking to two of your competitors. Or reach out to partners, to friends, do some content contributions, just a little thing to get one or two links. Or maybe create some content that’s targeting a missed keyword. When you do that, of course, you go through your pre-publish checklist.
Upgrade ranking content
Maybe you are upgrading some content that’s already ranking, like number 5 through 20. That’s where there’s a lot of opportunity for a high-value keyword to get bumped up. You could just do little things, like make sure that it’s serving all of these items, try and get it a featured snippet, identify content that might be old, that needs a refresh, that’s not serving the searcher intent as well because the information in there is old.
Contribute off-site content
Or you could try contributing some offsite content. That could be to places like YouTube, maybe you’ve seen videos show up for something, guest posts, a forum where you contribute, answers some questions on Quora, contribute something to LinkedIn or Medium, just something to get your brand, your content, and hopefully a link out there to a different audience than what’s already coming to your site.
You do these things, right, you start the month with an hour. Every time you publish content, you put in 3 minutes, and at the start of the week, you put in 10 minutes to do a couple pieces of planning, this will take you a long way. Look, SEO professionals are going to do a lot more than this, for sure. But this can be a great start, a great way to get that SEO kicked off, to have a minimum viable SEO plan.
I look forward to your thoughts. And we’ll see you again next week for another edition of Whiteboard Friday. Take care.